Ryan Burge in the New York Times on How Evangelical Today Means Republican

Ryan Burge from Eastern Illinois University wrote an essay for the New York Times the other day that is worth examining. In it the professor who is known for his work on the “Nones” wrote about the changing world of evangelicalism. Not only is he stating that evangelicalism is growing but that it is now identified with being political. In other words its another name for being Republican. 

“A harmful truth is better than a useful lie.

Thomas Mann

For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.

Hebrews 4:12 NIV

NCC3

Ryan Burge is a professor at Eastern Illinois University who has done a lot of scholarly work on the nones and American society. The other day in the New York Times he published an essay about the changing world of evangelicalism and how evangelicals are now synonymous with Republican. He also claims that evangelicalism is changing in that not only is it more political but more evangelicals do not associate with church. Its an interesting read and raises a lot of questions. You can read the original article on the New York Times website in, “Why ‘Evangelical’ Is Becoming Another Word for ‘Republican’” You can also read the article below but as always this blog encourages you to subscribe to your local newspaper.


The conventional wisdom about religion in the United States is that the number of people who have no religious affiliation is rising rapidly. In the 1970s, secular Americans (often called the Nones) made up just 5 percent of the population; now, that number has climbed to at least 30 percent. The data suggest that religious groups must be suffering tremendous losses as the Nones continue to increase in size and influence each year.

That’s why a recent report from the Pew Research Center came as a huge surprise. Its most shocking revelation was that, between 2016 and 2020, there was no significant decline in the share of white Americans who identify as evangelical Christians. Instead, the report found the opposite: During Donald Trump’s presidency, the number of white Americans who started identifying as evangelical actually grew.

Conservative Christians celebrated the news. For years, stories have appeared in media outlets about how many of the more theologically moderate denominations like Episcopalians and the United Church of Christ have suffered staggering losses in membership. The fact that denominations that allowed women pastors were declining while evangelical churches that took more conservative positions on views of gender and sexuality were holding their own was evidence for evangelicals that conservative religion has staying power. Because these moderate traditions were so much like the culture around them, the story went, it was easy for their members to fall away from church attendance. Evangelicals prided themselves on their distinctiveness from mainstream society, which insulated them from forces like secularization.

But they might hold off on patting themselves on the back too much. The number of self-identified evangelicals has likely not increased over the last few years because evangelicals have been effective at spreading the Gospel and bringing new converts to the church.

What is drawing more people to embrace the evangelical label on surveys is more likely that evangelicalism has been bound to the Republican Party. Instead of theological affinity for Jesus Christ, millions of Americans are being drawn to the evangelical label because of its association with the G.O.P.

This is happening in two different ways. The first is that many Americans who have begun to embrace the evangelical identity are people who hardly ever attend religious services. For instance, in 2008, just 16 percent of all self-identified evangelicals reported their church attendance as never or seldom. But in 2020, that number jumped to 27 percent. In 2008, about a third of evangelicals who never attended church said they were politically conservative. By 2019, that had risen to about 50 percent.

The data from the Pew Research Center reinforces that: Those who had warmer views of Mr. Trump were more likely to become evangelical between 2016 and 2020 than those who didn’t feel warmly toward him. The evidence points in one direction: For many Americans, to be a conservative Republican is to be an evangelical Christian, regardless of whether they ever attend a Sunday service.

The second factor bolstering evangelicalism on surveys is that more people are embracing the label who have no attachment to Protestant Christianity. For example, the share of Catholics who also identified as evangelicals (or born again) rose to 15 percent in 2018 from 9 percent in 2008. That same pattern appears with Muslims. In fact, there’s evidence that the share of Orthodox Christians, Hindus and members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who identify as evangelical is larger today than it was just a decade ago.

Yet these non-Protestants are embracing the evangelical label for slightly different reasons. Protestants and non-Protestants have a strong affinity for the Republican Party and the policies of Donald Trump, but non-Protestant evangelicals are much more religiously devout. For instance, half of Muslims who attend services at a mosque more than once a week and align with the G.O.P. self-identify as evangelical. (Just 20 percent of Republican Muslims attend mosque once a year.) In essence, many Americans are coming to the understanding that to be very religiously engaged and very politically conservative means that they are evangelical, even if they don’t believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ.

The rapid rise of the nonreligious and non-Protestant evangelical has meant that the tradition did not fade in any significant way over the last decade. But instead, what it means to be evangelical is being radically remade. It used to be that when many people thought about evangelicalism, they conjured up an image of a fiery preacher imploring them to accept Jesus. Now the data indicate that more and more Americans are conflating evangelicalism with Republicanism — and melding two forces to create a movement that is not entirely about politics or religion but power.

White evangelicalism has never been more politically unified than it is right now. In the 1970s, only 40 percent of white weekly churchgoing evangelicals identified as Republicans; in the most recent data, that number has risen to an all-time high of 70 percent.

he evangelical coalition of 2020 may not be in agreement about which religion is the correct one or even if religious devotion is necessary to identify as an evangelical. But on Election Day, they speak with one voice — in full-throated support of the Republican candidate.

6 thoughts on “Ryan Burge in the New York Times on How Evangelical Today Means Republican

    • Here’s a review of Downfall that stresses an often-neglected facet of Fuehrerprinzip – how the Followers are complicit in outsourcing their own wills to the Fuehrer. To the point that their brains atrophy – like smartphone junkies unable to function without constantly staring at their screen, they become unable to function without the Fuehrer above them.

      Like the parade of church corruption covered over at Wartburg Watch, Anointed Giga-Pastor Superapostle goes synergistic with the pew-warming enablers.

      Like

  1. This dynamic is not surprising, as more and more of those who identify as “evangelical” see their primary way of influencing the world and culture around them as being politically aligned with a political party and elevating certain politicians, as opposed to being “salt and light” in the culture and being “ambassadors for Christ” and His love. This is also the end result when one sees the world not in terms of a mission field but rather as a culture war battlefield.

    Funny how the New Testament has absolutely nothing to say about political involvement apart from saying to live at peace in society, to render unto Caesar the taxes that are Caesar’s, and to submit to governing authorities so as to not be seen as troublemakers. Quite the opposite, in fact, the NT stresses how our kingdom is not the world’s kingdom, and our battle is not against flesh and blood.

    Like

    • What happened is Evangelicals have been waiting for “TurboJesus” to return and SMITE all their enemies (real and imagined) in His Divine Wrath. When I was in-country during the Age of Hal Lindsay that was to be “Any Minute Now”. Well, “Any Minute Now” has dragged on for 50 years and the Evangelicals got tired of waiting. So they found a new God who (like the Dark Powers in Magick) WILL Get Things Done – “MAGA!!!”

      Like

      • I am actually reminded of Abraham and Sarah getting impatient waiting for the child God promised in their old age, and them ultimately taking matters into their own hands by having Abraham take Sarah’s servant Hagar as a concubine and fathering Ishmael. Much trouble and conflict directly resulted from their impatience with God’s timetable and their decision to implement their own plans rather than waiting on God. I think evangelicals today have fallen into much the same error. “We’ll find a guy who will do it for us, and exalt him as our leader!”

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.